About the author
This story was inspired by a roleplaying game called Exploration, written and played by Andy Weir and some of our friends in college. Here’s a picture of three of us from that time – graduation from UC San Diego in 1994. Andy’s on the left and I’m on the right.
Think (or better yet click) here to get to our main page.

BioniC WIt by Brendan ZaChary AllIson
“This so-called ‘cursor cortex’ and associated heksors would then lead to novel columnar organization, with not just neurons but structures devoted at least partly to interaction with artificial devices. Yet how novel are these, given adaptation to technology over-“ The professor paused as the two lecturers bracketing him began screaming competitively.
“And the demon will wield a nine-bladed sword!”
“Follow the gourd! The holy gourd of Jerusalem!”
The professor sighed, then hopped off his pedestal of truck tires and fishing nets and walked dejectedly along the cracked pavement. Acid rain diluted the puddles filled with most fluids that mammals produce. He bent down to pet a kitten before realizing it was dead.
“Professor?”
He startled, then thought ‘accept’ at his thalcomm. “Nah. More like profess-nor. Yes?”
“Hey. I want to hear the rest of your lecture.”
“And lemme guess, I just gotta pay you to AI-enhance it and then people will want it too?”
“Huh?”
“That’s the spam I get all the time. Nobody wants a real, live professor anymore because AI lecturers are better. Cheaper. Smarter. More charismatic. Access to every joke or witty line in history. Don’t care whether you pay attention, ask questions, make eye contact. And customized to each viewer. Only about a third of virtual lecturers wear clothes. AI has made human professors as useless as human nannies, coders, lawyers, OB/GYNs, content creators, proctologists, prostitutes-”
“I get it. But I want to hear your lecture. I took one of your classes 30 years ago. Changed my life.”
“Yeah,” he replied out loud, stepping over a decomposing marlin sprawled on the waterfront. “I used to have class. I used to be a contender. I used to be somebody. Instead of a bum.”
“Which is what I am.” The professor turned to the new voice just in time to see a derelict blow snot on him, then shamble off.
The professor reattended to the voice in his thalcomm. “So,” he thought with intent to send, “You see what happens when I think out loud.”
“You mean, speak?”
“Uh. Yeah. It’s like I’m invisible. Whatever I say is wrong. Didn’t used to be this way before AI raised the bar higher than any human could every produce.”
“That bothers me too. That’s why I thought-chatted at you.”
“You thatched me because misery loves company.”
“No. Here’s the deal. I provide code that will modify your thalcomm with all the knowledge and skill known to all your artificial competitors. Imagine speaking in real-time but you actually have AI helping you speak. You’ll be so much more debonaire.”
“Um. I don’t think that’s possible.” The professor paused. “Maybe, theoretically-“
“You presented your theory in one of your lectures. I’ve been working on it for 30 years. I wanted to offer it to you first out of respect and gratitude, but it sounds like you aren’t inter-”
“Whoa there,” he thought desperately. “Keep talking. Thinking. Communicating. Whatever.”
“That’s it. I told you the deal.”
“Yeah, usually a deal requires something from both parties. So I reject your deal, but just out of curiosity, what would have happened if I installed that code? It would have the opposite effect? You just get all my content to AI-enhance for free? Change my religion? I owe you my soul? Catfishing? I just drop dead? ID theft? Spam all my contacts to promote crypto?”
“I told you what I get out of it. I wanna help someone who helped me. I get to hear more of your theories and ideas. Look, I attached the code. You can check it before installing it.”
He did. It worked as described without side effects. His mysterious student, who had been entirely honest and earnest, never contacted him again. Three months later, his podcast and YouTube channel were both rated higher even than the Hubrisman Lab and Only Masturbators in the Building. Listeners preferred listening to an established, real human figure, unaware it was just a mouthpiece for AI. His thalcomm even worked when it was explanted without anesthesia and placed in the brain of the future president, later known as the Great Communicator.
Author Commentary
This is painfully autobiographical, although I haven’t yet decayed to lecturing on pedestals of moldy tires. But you’re providing me an audience by reading this. Thanks! Please do not spit on me nor send me code to reprogram an invasive BCI.
The opening paragraph adapts the terms “cursor cortex” and “heksors,” which were invented by Phil Kennedy and Jon Wolpaw, respectively. We’ve discussed them extensively. These issues will become increasingly important as neurotechnologies advance.
The two freak lecturers who shout down the protagonist are drawn from Life of Brian.
Two lines are paraphrased from Marlon Brando’s pathetic rant in the 1954 Oscar Winner “On the Waterfront.” This story occurs on a waterfront.
I asked the Huberman Lab to host me. They didn’t even reply. What hubris. (Them or me?)
Realism
The invention is an adaptation of a perk that Andy gave one of my characters in Exploration, who was a Sephalon named Devon Aare. (Note the word “debonair” in the story.) Devon led Aare Couriers. Since Devon was far more charismatic than I was, Andy gave me a great perk. I could have ten seconds to think of a witty comment but it would seem like real-time in the game. Great fun and much appreciated.
That would be an interesting invention. It’s impossible in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, if it were possible to get in ten seconds of thought in real-time, other applications would emerge. For example, it would be a great fighting tool. You could have ten seconds to plan your next move. I’d take that over the interface in Battle Children. It would be a huge boon in numerous games. Perhaps I should write more about that someday.
Back to the invention in this story – which provides AI-enhanced speech in real-time. You would need these components:
| Component | How |
| Know local context – at least words. | Microphone and language comprehension software |
| Develop witty responses faster than people. | AI can do this now and is rapidly improving. |
| Cue humans to develop or know them. | Targeted, adaptive, customized MEA stimulation. |
Part 3 is the only part I can’t figure out today. Here’s my best guess on how it might be possible:
You’d need much more precise and detailed implants than we’ll have in my lifetime. Implant relevant auditory and language areas such as the thalamus (at least MGN), inferior colliculus, thalamus, Auditory cortices, Broca’s, Wernicke’s, arcuate fasciculus, etc.
Learn which activation patterns convey specific words. This has been possible for many years but only with limited vocabularies. By 2030, vocabulary size will be large enough for pretty good conversations at TRL 5 (that is, validated in laboratory conditions).
The bigger challenge involves stimulating specific words. Words are distributed over many thousands of neurons, each of which represents many other words. Reading is a lot easier than stimulating and would probably entail learning/reading from a specific user for quite a while to train your system. Word order would be a challenge too.
When something is heard, AI figures out the best verbal (and other) responses near- instantly. Prime specific words and phrases by stimulating relevant neural patterns. You can also do the opposite – suppress possibly bad comments. Hm. That’s another story I should write.
Follow-up: Gerv Schalk called it “completely impossible using current technologies” and he knows more about this than I do. I did say it wouldn’t be possible in my lifetime. Arguably, his prediction is more generous than mine. I expect to see multiple revolutions in my lifetime.
Hope
If that professor’s lectures were as interesting or inspiring as he thinks, then this story is hopeful. He got redemption, attention, and respect. And the contribution from a former student was purely altruistic. Hope wanes since the story does also address AI superseding humanity.
Edit History
I wrote this in December 2025. I posted it on April 22, 2026 – a couple days after I gave a keynote lecture for the Guger Technologies Spring School. All such lectures are keynotes, which is a clever marketing trick. This site got a surge with over 60 views, which I hope is someday a nadir rather than zenith. So I decided to post this, a sad tale of a professor with less attention than he wanted and perhaps deserved.
Comments and Replies
Comment away!
Leave a Reply